Draft: Different Frames on Bodybuilding

Feb 28, 2026

I think the popular evidence based bodybuilding space has more implicit frames and assumptions than is commonly acknowledged. I’d like to try to make some of these assumptions explicit as well as offer some alternative frames I find plausible or under-appreciated.

The common frame

This frame says something like this: You do exercises and the exercised muscles get a stimulus to grow. This weakens the muscle but then you rest and given enough calories and protein and sleep and other factors allowing the muscle grows and gets stronger. Then you repeat. The stimulus is local to the exercised muscle, working out your biceps does not grow your triceps. You want to exercise often to get more opportunities for growth but not so often that the targeted muscle doesn’t have time to recover and get stronger. In a workout you do many sets of an exercise to provide a bigger growth stimulus, although there are diminishing returns. People vary in how easily they grow and get stronger but these principles apply to everyone.

Implicitly this frame also comes with some assumptions about what is not important, or at least less important: non-local systemic factors and hormonal responses to workouts, neural activation and the skill aspect of lifting, psychological difficulty, and whatever “unknown unknowns” I’m not thinking of here.

I’m actually quite uncertain about to what extent this perspective is basically obviously correct and true vs not quite the full story. But I’d like to flesh out some of these alternative frames and ways of looking at what’s important and what the most actionable nobs and dials are.

Take all of these lightly

Systemic factors

and you must rest enough between workouts to

neural activation, skillmaxxing, calisthenics aligned

The common frame is incomplete, because it’s ignoring an important contributor to your ability to provide a strong growth stimulus to the muscle, namely your skill, or your ability to really use the muscle fully. Without some skill and neural adaptation you will be unable to lift the weight before the muscle is as cooked as could be, because you’re not using it as efficiently as you could, because at the neural level you’re literally not “trying” as hard as is possible, and because you’re unwillingly activating other irrelevant muscles which are interfering.

You should

neural activation, skillmaxxing, calisthenics aligned

reward to effort/difficulty and psychological feasibility, the real bottleneck is willpower

rest-maxxing

vibe based reactivity, exercise the muscle when it’s ready

k Exercises apply local muscle stimulus. Then when you rest

There’s some

Alternative frames

This one

This other one

This other one

← Back to home